Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41075970›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology2026

A Scoping Review of Barriers to Accessing Abortions among Adolescents in the United States.

Julie Maslowsky, Naomi Harada Thyden, Renee Odom-Konja, Catherine Gimbrone, Joanna Paul, Eleanor Esbrook, Rosie Hanneke, Laura D Lindberg

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julie MaslowskyDepartment of Health Behavior and Clinical Sciences, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago School of Public Health, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: jmaslow@umich.edu.
Naomi Harada ThydenDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago School of Public Health, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Children, Youth, and Families, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Renee Odom-KonjaDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago School of Public Health, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cook County Health, Chicago, Illinois.
Catherine GimbroneDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York.
Joanna PaulDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago School of Public Health, Chicago, Illinois.
Eleanor EsbrookDepartment of Children, Youth, and Families, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Rosie HannekeDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago School of Public Health, Chicago, Illinois.
Laura D LindbergDepartment of Urban-Global Public Health, Rutgers School of Public Health, Newark, New Jersey.

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAM IN PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGYT32MH013043 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Katherine M. Keyes · 1985 to 2026
$11.7M
Minnesota Population Center Science and Technical CoreP2CHD041023 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI THERESA LOUISE OSYPUK · 2016 to 2026
$4.3M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041023NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH013043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectiveEven before the Dobbs Supreme Court decision, minors experienced a wide variety of barriers to abortion care in the United States, including legal, financial, cultural, transportation, and misinformation barriers as well as pressure from parents and partners. This scoping review summarizes the literature on barriers to abortion among minors in the United States prior to the Dobbs decision.

methodsWe conducted a database search to identify original research in the United States published between 2007 and 2022. We included quantitative and qualitative empirical articles and assessed their quality. We created categories for the barriers to abortion among minors identified in the articles. We screened 7584 records and included 70 articles in the scoping review. We charted study aims, study designs, data sources, analytic samples, and results.

resultsThe articles explored factors related to abortion access and identified several categories of barriers to abortion among minors. These included legal barriers (41 articles found them to be a barrier), financial barriers (14 articles), cultural barriers (13 articles), transportation barriers (12 articles), pressure from parents (11 articles), misinformation (8 articles), and pressure from a partner (8 articles). Legal barriers, including laws that require minors to inform or get permission from an adult guardian, were the most commonly identified barrier.

conclusionThese findings suggest that minors need policy and interpersonal support to overcome general and age-specific barriers to abortion care. Future research should examine if and how barriers for minors have intensified post-Dobbs, informing targeted policy responses.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedHealth Services AccessibilityMinorsPregnancy in AdolescenceAdolescentFemaleHumansPregnancyUnited StatesAbortionAdolescentHealth Services AccessibilityPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41075970
PMCPMC13007049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.