ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2025
The utility of ultra-deep RNA sequencing in Mendelian disorder diagnostics.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-species functional analysis of aResearch square · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Utility of RNAseq in Prenatal Diagnostics: Expression Profiles of Cultured Chorionic Villus and Amniotic Fluid Samples.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Article
- Translating transcriptomics analysis into diagnostic workflows: clinical variant identification and interpretation in hypothesis-driven and hypothesis-free approaches.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
- EXOSC3 G191 Variants Trigger System-Wide Recalibration of RNA Processing Machinery.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Clinical validation of RNA sequencing for Mendelian disorder diagnostics.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has emerged as a powerful tool for resolving variants of uncertain significance (VUSs), particularly those affecting gene expression and splicing. However, most reference datasets and diagnostic protocols employ relatively modest sequencing depths (∼50-150 million reads), which may fail to detect low-abundance transcripts and rare splicing events critical for accurate diagnosis. We evaluated the diagnostic and translational utility of ultra-high-depth (up to ∼1 billion unique reads) RNA-seq in four clinically accessible tissues using the Ultima sequencing platform. After validating the performance of Ultima RNA-seq, we investigated how increasing sequencing depth affects gene and isoform detection, splicing variant discovery, and clinical interpretation of VUSs. Deep RNA-seq substantially improved sensitivity for detecting lowly expressed genes and isoforms, achieving near saturation for detection at 1 billion reads. In two probands with VUSs, pathogenic splicing abnormalities were undetectable at 50 million reads but emerged at 200 million reads, becoming even more pronounced at 1 billion reads. Using deep RNA-seq data, we constructed a resource, MRSD-deep, to estimate the minimum required sequencing depth to achieve desired coverage thresholds. MRSD-deep provided gene- and junction-level guidelines, helping labs select appropriate coverage targets for specific applications. Leveraging deep RNA-seq data on fibroblasts, we also built an expanded splicing-variation reference that successfully identified low-abundance splicing events missed by standard-depth data. Our findings underscore the diagnostic and research benefits of deep RNA-seq for Mendelian disease investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.