ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2025
South African Podiatry Students' Experiences of Their Clinical Learning Environment.
Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- South African Podiatry Students' Experiences of Their Clinical Learning Environment.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe role and purpose of a clinical learning environment (CLE) is to help students become confident and independent practitioners. Exposure to clinical learning environments provides podiatry students with essential experiential learning opportunities and skills that are difficult to obtain elsewhere. Anecdotal evidence suggests that podiatry students encounter various obstacles in CLEs, although these obstacles have not been thoroughly described. This article, therefore, aims to understand and describe South African podiatry students' experiences of their clinical learning environment.
methodsA qualitative research method was employed. A purposive sampling strategy was used to select undergraduate podiatry students from the University of Johannesburg to participate in a focus group discussion. Eight students took part in the focus group discussion, which was audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using Giorgi's qualitative thematic analysis.
resultsThree main themes were identified: (i) Attitudes of supervising clinicians, (ii) Student confidence and (iii) Shortage of supervising clinicians.
conclusionOverall, the experiences of podiatry students in their clinical environment were negative. Understanding these obstacles may offer insight into the improvement of the clinical learning environment, and it may be possible to facilitate the development of competent and confident podiatrists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.