Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41075288›Full record

ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2025

South African Podiatry Students' Experiences of Their Clinical Learning Environment.

Moothee Melissa, Ntuli Simiso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Moothee MelissaDepartment of Podiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0592-7027
Ntuli SimisoDepartment of Podiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0930-1734

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role and purpose of a clinical learning environment (CLE) is to help students become confident and independent practitioners. Exposure to clinical learning environments provides podiatry students with essential experiential learning opportunities and skills that are difficult to obtain elsewhere. Anecdotal evidence suggests that podiatry students encounter various obstacles in CLEs, although these obstacles have not been thoroughly described. This article, therefore, aims to understand and describe South African podiatry students' experiences of their clinical learning environment.

methodsA qualitative research method was employed. A purposive sampling strategy was used to select undergraduate podiatry students from the University of Johannesburg to participate in a focus group discussion. Eight students took part in the focus group discussion, which was audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using Giorgi's qualitative thematic analysis.

resultsThree main themes were identified: (i) Attitudes of supervising clinicians, (ii) Student confidence and (iii) Shortage of supervising clinicians.

conclusionOverall, the experiences of podiatry students in their clinical environment were negative. Understanding these obstacles may offer insight into the improvement of the clinical learning environment, and it may be possible to facilitate the development of competent and confident podiatrists.

Indexed as

PodiatryProblem-Based LearningStudents, MedicalAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSouth AfricaYoung Adultclinical learning environmentexperiencesexperiential learningpodiatrystudents

Identifiers

PMID41075288
PMCPMC12515051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.