Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41075164›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2025

Social relationships and epigenetic markers of aging in middle-aged and older adults: cross-sectional and prospective analyses.

Danmeng Lily Li, Xiaojing Xu, Allison M Hodge, Melissa C Southey, Graham G Giles, Roger L Milne, Pierre-Antoine Dugué

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Danmeng Lily LiPrecision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Xiaojing XuPrecision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Allison M HodgeCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Melissa C SoutheyPrecision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Graham G GilesPrecision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Roger L MilnePrecision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5764-7268
Pierre-Antoine DuguéPrecision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2736-3023

Funding

Australian National Health and Medical Research Council 1074383Australian National Health and Medical Research Council 396414Wellcome Trust 209057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSocial relationships play an important role in maintaining physical and psychological health. Epigenetic age is a potential mechanism underlying health-related aspects of social relationships. We aimed to assess the cross-sectional and prospective associations of social relationships and epigenetic age in middle-aged and older adults.

methodsBlood DNA methylation data were collected from 6,208 participants in the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study at baseline (1990-1994, mean age = 59) and 1,110 at follow-up (2003-2007, mean age = 69). Four epigenetic aging measures were considered: PCPhenoAge, PCGrimAge, bAge, and DunedinPACE. Social relationship variables were collected via self-reported questionnaires at baseline, including social activities, living arrangements, marital status, and numbers of close relatives and friends. A social isolation index was calculated. Linear regression was used to assess the associations of social relationships with baseline and follow-up epigenetic age.

resultsCross-sectionally, living alone and overall social isolation were associated with older epigenetic age in men only (e.g., living alone, DunedinPACE, per SD β = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.10-0.29), with strong evidence of effect modification by sex (p = .002 to 4 × 10-5). Moderate amounts of social activities and a greater number of relatives and friends were also associated with a younger epigenetic age. Generally weaker associations were observed in prospective analyses. DISCUSSION: In middle-aged and older Australians, positive components of social relationships showed weak associations with lower epigenetic age. Social isolation and living alone were associated with older epigenetic age only in men. Our study suggests that the benefits of social relationships to health are partially captured by epigenetic markers of aging.

Indexed as

AgingDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticInterpersonal RelationsSocial IsolationAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesBiological agingDNA methylationLiving arrangementSocial connectednessSocial isolation

Identifiers

PMID41075164
PMCPMC12629536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.