ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
Innovative Drugs Approved in China After Registration Classification Reform: Current Status, Disparities, and Challenges.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- An alternative method to validate surrogate endpoints in oncology.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Pooled it
- International approval of Chinese pharmaceuticals: a USA-anchored analysis with comparative insights from Europe and other markets.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- A cross-national review of novel oncology approvals in the United States and China (2020-2025).Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- The global clinical trial landscape of PD-1-containing bispecific antibodies for gastric cancer: current status and future directions of targeting immune tolerance.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Cross-jurisdictional access to innovative drugs and devices: a five-year policy and practice review of the Hong Kong and Macao medicine and equipment connect in the Greater Bay Area of China.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since 2016, the China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) has reformed its drug registration classification rules and defines the innovative drugs as new drugs that have not been marketed domestically and overseas. This study sought to systematically evaluate the characteristics of the innovative drugs approved in China. The cross-sectional study included all innovative small molecules that submitted a marketing application after 2016 and were approved by the NMPA before 2024, as well as all innovative biologics and Chinese medicines that submitted after 2020 and were approved before 2024. Based on the NMPA's open databases, information on each drug and its pivotal trial was collected. A total of 167 innovative drugs were approved, consisting of 58.1% small molecules, 31.1% biologics, and 10.8% Chinese medicines. The domestic drugs dominated (86.8%) and continued to grow from 2018 to 2024. The drugs were concentrated in the oncology area (43.7%), particularly in biologics (55.8%). Most oncology drugs (90.4%) were approved based on surrogate end-point evidence. Chinese medicines received much less regulatory flexibility than small molecules/biologics. The expedited programs helped accelerate the clinical development and review processes. However, the review time tended to exceed the stipulated timeframes. The great efforts of the Chinese regulator and industry in nurturing innovation are bearing fruit. More investments from the regulator and drug developers are needed to focus on R&D in differentiated therapies, financial incentives and regulatory priorities for high-quality innovations, along with review capacity improvements, in order to facilitate an innovation-driven and internationally competent pharmaceutical industry in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.