Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41075154›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026

Innovative Drugs Approved in China After Registration Classification Reform: Current Status, Disparities, and Challenges.

Xingyue Zhu, Die Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xingyue ZhuSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9293-9247
Die XiaoSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since 2016, the China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) has reformed its drug registration classification rules and defines the innovative drugs as new drugs that have not been marketed domestically and overseas. This study sought to systematically evaluate the characteristics of the innovative drugs approved in China. The cross-sectional study included all innovative small molecules that submitted a marketing application after 2016 and were approved by the NMPA before 2024, as well as all innovative biologics and Chinese medicines that submitted after 2020 and were approved before 2024. Based on the NMPA's open databases, information on each drug and its pivotal trial was collected. A total of 167 innovative drugs were approved, consisting of 58.1% small molecules, 31.1% biologics, and 10.8% Chinese medicines. The domestic drugs dominated (86.8%) and continued to grow from 2018 to 2024. The drugs were concentrated in the oncology area (43.7%), particularly in biologics (55.8%). Most oncology drugs (90.4%) were approved based on surrogate end-point evidence. Chinese medicines received much less regulatory flexibility than small molecules/biologics. The expedited programs helped accelerate the clinical development and review processes. However, the review time tended to exceed the stipulated timeframes. The great efforts of the Chinese regulator and industry in nurturing innovation are bearing fruit. More investments from the regulator and drug developers are needed to focus on R&D in differentiated therapies, financial incentives and regulatory priorities for high-quality innovations, along with review capacity improvements, in order to facilitate an innovation-driven and internationally competent pharmaceutical industry in China.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalBiological ProductsChinaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID41075154
PMCPMC12816426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.