Observational studyLa Radiologia medica2026
The role of multidisciplinary discussion in diagnosis and management of interstitial lung diseases: a retrospective evaluation of a single-center 10 years' of experience.
Observational study in La Radiologia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe importance of multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) in interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) is well known. The aim of this study was to describe the 10-year experience of the MDD at the Pisa University Hospital in diagnosis and management of ILDs. MATERIAL AND
methodsA single-center retrospective observational study was conducted at the Pisa University Hospital. A multidisciplinary group for ILDs diagnosis was instituted in 2012, and all patients referred till August 2022 were included.
resultsAltogether 1240 patients were evaluated. At baseline assessment, 772 common multidisciplinary diagnoses were achieved, while in 458 cases it was not possible to obtain a definite diagnosis. Most frequent multidisciplinary diagnoses were idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), and smoking-related ILDs. In 9% of cases a histological evaluation was performed, leading to a diagnosis in 75% of cases. One-thousand and fourty-eight cases with at least one year of follow-up after the MDD were revised. Common diagnoses were confirmed or modified, while "diagnostic hypotheses" were changed into "revised diagnoses" or left as hypothesis as they still could not be confirmed. Among common diagnoses, 61% were confirmed, while 36% were not confirmed as patients did not perform further examinations or visits. Eighteen diagnoses were modified (3%). Among the "diagnostic hypotheses," 57% changed into "revised diagnoses." Only in 15% of cases a definite diagnosis was not achieved after the revision.
conclusionThe role of MDD in ILDs' assessment and diagnosis was confirmed. A multidisciplinary approach should be considered in the long-term follow-up of ILDs, as diagnosis may change on the basis of clinical course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41075132What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.