Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41075128›Full record

ReviewEndocrine2025

Still counting sperm? Why novel, truly informative measurements of testis function in male infertility are urgently needed.

Chiara Furini, Francesco Costantino, Antonio Rm Granata, Giorgia Spaggiari, Daniele Santi, Manuela Simoni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chiara FuriniUnit of Endocrinology, Department of Medical Specialties, Azienda Ospedaliero- Universitaria of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Francesco CostantinoUnit of Endocrinology, Department of Medical Specialties, Azienda Ospedaliero- Universitaria of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Antonio Rm GranataUnit of Endocrinology, Department of Medical Specialties, Azienda Ospedaliero- Universitaria of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Giorgia SpaggiariUnit of Endocrinology, Department of Medical Specialties, Azienda Ospedaliero- Universitaria of Modena, Modena, Italy. spaggiari.giorgia@aou.mo.it.ORCID 0000-0002-7089-7330
Daniele SantiUnit of Endocrinology, Department of Medical Specialties, Azienda Ospedaliero- Universitaria of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Manuela SimoniUnit of Endocrinology, Department of Medical Specialties, Azienda Ospedaliero- Universitaria of Modena, Modena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Couple infertility is estimated to affect between 13% and 18% of all couples of reproductive age, with male factors accounting for at least 50% of cases. Semen analysis is the first-line investigation for all male partners of couples referred for fertility evaluation. However, semen analysis is far from being a good predictor of the ultimate outcome: pregnancy. For instance, in approximately 25% of infertility cases, conventional semen parameters are considered ‘normal’, leading to a diagnosis of so-called ‘unexplained infertility’. Nonetheless, this tool is central in the assessment of male fertility potential. This review first provides a historical perspective on the evaluation of male infertility based on semen analysis, illustrating the evolution of diagnostic approaches over time. The second section explores major changes in the interpretation of semen analysis and highlights the need for alternative methodologies. Finally, the last section examines critically the limitations and pitfalls of semen analysis in the diagnostic workup of male infertility and suggests exploring radical new approaches. The aim of this work is to raise awareness of the clinical limitations of conventional semen analysis and, consequently, to emphasize the urgency of identifying new strategies for diagnosing male infertility and optimizing treatment decisions both a priori and during potential interventions.

Indexed as

Infertility, MaleSemen AnalysisHumansMaleSperm CountTestisAssisted reproductionCoupleCouple infertilityMale infertilitySemen

Identifiers

PMID41075128
PMCPMC12708806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.