ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Deep learning-based high precision 3D ultrasound imaging for large size organ.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging offers a larger field of view and enables volumetric measurements. Among the versatile methods, free-hand 3D ultrasound imaging utilizing deep learning networks for spatial coordinate prediction exhibits advantages in terms of simplified device configuration and user-friendliness. However, this imaging method is restricted to predicting the relative spatial transformation between two consecutive 2D ultrasound images, resulting in substantial cumulative errors. When imaging large organs, cumulative errors can severely distort the 3D images. In this study, we proposed a labeling strategy based on the ultrasound image coordinate system, enhancing the network prediction accuracy. Meanwhile, pre-planning the scanning trajectory and using it to guide the network prediction significantly reduced cumulative error. Spinal 3D ultrasound imaging was performed on both healthy volunteers and scoliosis patients. Comparison of reconstruction results across different methods demonstrated that the proposed method improved the prediction accuracy by approximately 40% and reduced the cumulative error by nearly 80%. This method shows promise for application in various deep learning networks and different tissues and is expected to facilitate the broader clinical adoption of 3D ultrasound imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41075113What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.