Comparison of augmented reality visualization approaches in minimally invasive neurosurgery guidance: 2D, tablet, HMD and autostereoscopic displays.

Minimally invasive neurosurgery presents specific challenges due to the limited operative space and complex cranial anatomy, requiring highly precise and safe surgical guidance. Augmented Reality (AR) technology offers the potential to improve surgical accuracy and safety by overlaying critical digital information onto real-world surgical environments. In this study, we present a study that aims to compare four AR visualization methods-2D flat display, smart tablet, head-mounted display (HMD), and 3D autostereoscopic display-in guiding minimally invasive neurosurgical procedures, specifically focusing on ventriculocentesis. The effectiveness of the AR methods was evaluated through comprehensive user studies involving 32 participants (including 11 experienced surgeons), with assessment focused on critical performance metrics including accuracy, completion time, usability, and cognitive workload during simulated surgical procedures. Results demonstrated that 3D visualization methods significantly outperformed traditional 2D approaches in terms of puncture accuracy and angular precision. Specifically, surgeons showed a statistically significant improvement in localization accuracy, with mean error reduced from 2.69 mm to 1.67 mm, and angular deviation from 5.62° to 1.54°. In comparing the two 3D visualization systems, the HMD exhibited superior task completion efficiency, while the 3D autostereoscopic display demonstrated higher usability scores and lower perceived workload ratings. Notably, the 3D systems effectively reduced the performance disparity between novice and experienced practitioners, suggesting their potential to accelerate the learning curve for less experienced users. We conclude that AR holds significant potential to enhance performance and decision-making in minimally invasive neurosurgical guidance.