Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41075086›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Decision Tree for Prediction of Binding Affinity.

Amauri Duarte da Silva, Walter Filgueira de Azevedo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amauri Duarte da SilvaGraduate Program in Information Technologies and Health Management, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Walter Filgueira de AzevedoDepartment of Physics, Institute of Exact Sciences, Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas, MG, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in machine learning methods indicate the adequacy of these approaches to build scoring functions to predict binding affinity. Applying the scoring function to determine protein-ligand interaction is a pivotal step in the early stages of drug discovery projects, where we integrate docking results and machine learning techniques to create an adequate model for a protein system of interest. Here, we focus on regression models built using Decision Trees to address protein-ligand interactions. This powerful machine learning technique can build models to address complex systems for classification and regression problems. We show how to apply the Decision Tree method to explore the concept of scoring function space using the program SKReg4Model. This program builds regression models using features from Vina Force Field, and energy terms are determined using Molegro Virtual Docker or any docking program. We based its code on the program SAnDReS 2.0 and the Scikit-Learn library. All datasets and a Jupyter Notebook with SKReg4Model discussed in this work are available at GitHub: https://github.com/azevedolab/docking#readme . We made the program SAnDReS 2.0 available at https://github.com/azevedolab/sandres .

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDecision TreesMolecular Docking SimulationProteinsSoftwareBinding SitesDrug DiscoveryLigandsMachine LearningProtein BindingLigandsProteinsArtificial intelligenceBiological systemsComplex systemsDecision treeMachine learningSAnDReS 2.0Scoring function space

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.