Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41075081›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

A Primer on SAnDReS 2.0 for Scoring Function Design.

Amauri Duarte da Silva, Martina Veit-Acosta, Olga Tarasova, Walter Filgueira de Azevedo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amauri Duarte da SilvaGraduate Program in Information Technologies and Health Management, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Martina Veit-AcostaWestern Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.
Olga TarasovaInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
Walter Filgueira de AzevedoDepartment of Physics, Institute of Exact Sciences, Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas, MG, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Docking screens rely on several computational techniques to analyze protein-ligand interactions. In this work, we focus on supervised machine learning. We discuss the application of linear regression using the program SAnDReS 2.0 to build a model to predict the inhibition of enzymes. Linear regression is a method to construct a supervised machine learning model based on a training dataset. This model considers parameters that minimize a cost function based on experimental information. The cost function captures the adequacy of the model and indicates how close the predicted values are to the experimental values. Linear regression belongs to a class of methods named parametric models. This simple approach is of general application to docking screens. We discuss its mathematical aspects and implementation using the Scikit-Learn library. We present a simple implementation of linear regression and its application to a toy dataset based on randomly generated data. Also, we discuss an application of this regression algorithm to study the inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 2. We developed a linear regression model using the program SAnDReS 2.0 to predict the inhibition of this enzyme. Additionally, we propose end-of-chapter exercises to improve understanding of the concepts discussed here. We made available all the codes discussed here at GitHub: https://github.com/azevedolab/docking#readme .

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMolecular Docking SimulationSoftwareAlgorithmsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 2HumansLigandsLinear ModelsProtein BindingCyclin-Dependent Kinase 2LigandsAlphaFoldArtificial intelligenceCyclin-dependent kinase 2DockingMachine learningProtein-ligand interactionsSAnDReS

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.