Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41075080›Full record

ArticleMolecular diversity2026

Quercetin as a selective quorum sensing inhibitor: in silico and in vitro analyses against Pseudomonas syringae with limited impact on plant growth-promoting bacteria.

Shivangi Bhatt, Jignesh Prajapati, Dweipayan Goswami, Meenu Saraf

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shivangi BhattDepartment of Microbiology and Biotechnology, University School of Science, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 38000, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1610-7724
Jignesh PrajapatiDepartment of Biochemistry and Forensic Science, University School of Science, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 38000, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8700-9929
Dweipayan GoswamiDepartment of Microbiology and Biotechnology, University School of Science, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 38000, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0165-0294
Meenu SarafDepartment of Microbiology and Biotechnology, University School of Science, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 38000, India. msaraf@gujaratuniversity.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4964-9452

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quorum sensing (QS) is a bacterial communication mechanism that coordinates gene expression and regulates population-dependent behaviors such as biofilm formation, virulence, and antibiotic resistance. Pseudomonas syringae, a major plant pathogen, causes bacterial blight in legumes, significantly reducing crop productivity. In contrast, plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPR) produce secondary metabolites that enhance plant growth and protect against pathogens. This study aimed to identify plant-derived compounds capable of selectively disrupting the QS of P. syringae without adversely affecting beneficial PGPR strains, using a combined in silico and in vitro approach. The QS-specific mode of action was functionally confirmed using a Chromobacterium violaceum biosensor assay, which revealed potent, dose-dependent inhibition of violacein pigment. Molecular docking and MM-GBSA (Molecular Mechanics Generalized Born Surface Area) analyses identified quercetin as the most potent compound, exhibiting strong binding affinity (docking score: - 10.363 kcal/mol; binding energy: - 55.89 kcal/mol) to QS-related proteins in P. syringae. Beneficial bacteria, including Klebsiella pneumoniae and Sinorhizobium meliloti, showed lower affinities to quercetin. Chromobacterium violaceum, a well-known QS reporter strain used as a control, exhibited the lowest sub-minimum inhibitory concentration (47.22 μg/mL). Experimentally, quercetin inhibited bacterial growth by 90-95% at 1024 μg/mL. The sub-MIC values for P. syringae, K. pneumoniae, and S. meliloti were 156.7, 242.6, and 535.7 μg/mL, respectively. At 64 μg/mL, quercetin suppressed biofilm formation by 92% in P. syringae, 95-98% in K. pneumoniae and S. meliloti, and 78% in C. violaceum. These findings highlight quercetin's selective disruption of QS and biofilm formation in P. syringae, underscoring its potential as a targeted biocontrol agent for legume crop protection.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsPseudomonas syringaeQuercetinQuorum SensingBiofilmsChromobacteriumComputer SimulationMolecular Docking SimulationPlant DevelopmentAnti-Bacterial AgentsQuercetinMD simulationMolecular docking (MD)PGPR (plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria)Pseudomonas syringaeQuercetinQuorum sensing (QS)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.