Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41075034›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2025

Influence of alumina shot blasting induced roughness on bacterial adhesion to titanium.

Marta Romero-Serrano, Manuel María Romero-Ruiz, José Vicente Ríos-Santos, Blanca Ríos-Carrasco, Javier Gil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marta Romero-SerranoPeriodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry. University of Seville, c/Avicena s/n, Seville, 41009, Spain.
Manuel María Romero-RuizPeriodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry. University of Seville, c/Avicena s/n, Seville, 41009, Spain.
José Vicente Ríos-SantosPeriodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry. University of Seville, c/Avicena s/n, Seville, 41009, Spain.
Blanca Ríos-CarrascoPeriodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry. University of Seville, c/Avicena s/n, Seville, 41009, Spain.
Javier GilBioinspired Oral Biomaterials and Interfaces. Materials Science and Engineering Department. EEBE, Technical University of Catalonia, Eduard Maristany Av. 16, Barcelona, 08019, Spain. javier.gil.mur@upc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the influence of different surface roughness levels of titanium disks, induced by alumina blasting, on bacterial adhesion. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwelve different surface roughnesses, ranging from 0.01 μm to 6 μm, were produced using a shot blasting technique with varying alumina particle sizes. Surface roughness was measured using confocal interferometry, wettability was assessed by contact angle measurements, and compressive residual stress was evaluated by X-ray diffraction. For each roughness level, 720 samples were used to culture Porphyromonas gingivalis (Gram-negative, anaerobic) and Streptococcus sanguinis (Gram-positive, anaerobic). The colonies formed per unit area, the ratio of dead bacteria to total bacteria, and the metabolic activity for each roughness ere determined.

resultsThe polished surface (Sa = 0.01 μm) showed the highest bacterial adhesion for both strains compared to the 0.13 μm roughness, which exhibited a antibacterial activity, likely due to nanostructured peaks causing bacterial membrane disruption. For surface roughness values between 0.5 and 3 μm, Gram-positive bacterial colonies increased approximately threefold. When the roughness exceeded 3.8 μm, colony formation rose fivefold. In contrast, Gram-negative bacteria did not exhibit statistically significant changes in adhesion between 0.5 and 2 μm. However, beginning at 2.6 μm, a marked increase was observed, with colony numbers reaching nearly four times the control at 6 μm. The ratio of dead bacteria and metabolic activity confirms bacterial colonization studies (CFU/mm

conclusionsSurface roughness significantly influenced bacterial colonization on titanium implants. An antibacterial effect was observed at a roughness of 0.13 μm. Bacterial adhesion increased moderately up to 2.1 μm for Gram-negative and 3 μm for Gram-positive strains, followed by a sharp rise at higher roughness values. An optimal surface roughness range of 1 to 2 μm appears to promote favorable osteoblastic response while minimizing bacterial adhesion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results enhance our understanding of how implant surface roughness influences bacterial adhesion. This knowledge could contribute to the development of clinical approaches designed to lower the risk of peri-implantitis.

Indexed as

Aluminum OxideBacterial AdhesionTitaniumInterferometryMaterials TestingParticle SizePorphyromonas gingivalisStreptococcus sanguisSurface PropertiesWettabilityX-Ray DiffractionAluminum OxideTitaniumAluminaBacteriaResidual stressRoughnessShot blastingWettability

Identifiers

PMID41075034
PMCPMC12515120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.