ArticleClinical oral investigations2025
Deep learning approach for tooth numbering and restoration detection on pediatric periapical radiographs in mixed dentition.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAccurate tooth numbering and restoration detection on periapical radiographs in mixed dentition are critical to the treatment planning process. They also improve the speed and accuracy of treatment processes by automating the early diagnosis process. This study aims to evaluate the numbering of teeth on periapical radiographs taken during the mixed dentition period and the detection efficiency of dental restorations using the YOLOv8 model. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study included 1,504 periapical radiographs to number primary And permanent teeth taken for diagnostic purposes for patients between the ages of 6 And 12 And 1,599 periapical radiographs to evaluate the automatic detection efficiency of restorations. Python programming language and YOLOv8 model were used. Model performance success, IoU (Intersection over Union) confusion matrix, accuracy, precision, F1-score, and recall values were used to evaluate the performance of the models.
resultsRecall, precision, F1-score, and accuracy values calculated using the confusion matrix for numbering teeth were determined as 0.915, 0.979, 0.946, And 0.89, respectively. Recall, precision, F1-score, and accuracy values for the detection of restorations were calculated as 0.954, 0.871, 0.911, And 0.83, respectively.
conclusionYOLOv8-based deep learning models offer a promising model for accurate numbering of primary and permanent teeth and detection of restorations in periapical radiographs of pediatric patients with mixed dentition, leading to future studies with high accuracy rates. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Automating the process of identifying and numbering teeth in dental radiographs, the first stage of clinical evaluation in dentistry, with artificial intelligence-based algorithms saves physicians significant time and labor in diagnosis and treatment planning, increasing the efficiency and accuracy of clinical practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41074996What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.