ArticleOecologia2025
Ectoparasite and blood parasite prevalence in birds: a comparative study between urbanized airport environments and natural habitats.
Article in Oecologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid growth of urban populations and air travel has intensified urbanization's ecological impacts, reshaping ecosystems through habitat fragmentation, pollution, and species filtering. These effects are particularly evident in urban bird populations. In this study, we examined how urban environments, especially near airports, affect birds by evaluating relationships among parasites, feather corticosterone levels, and body condition. We hypothesized that birds near airports would experience higher parasite prevalence due to stress-related immune compromise. We sampled 1,096 birds from 100 species, recording haemosporidian parasite lineages and ectoparasites across three Brazilian airports, Brasília, Salvador, and Campinas, and corresponding quiet-control areas located 8-17 km away. Using Bayesian multilevel models, we accounted for species relatedness and environmental factors. Overall, 21.8% of birds were infected with haemosporidian parasites. Turdus leucomelas showed the highest infection rate (44%), with Plasmodium representing 63% of all infections. Ectoparasites infested 9.2% of birds, especially Elaenia chiriquensis. Fifteen individuals, mostly in Salvador and Campinas control sites, harbored both parasite groups. Contrary to expectations, haemosporidian prevalence was lower in airport areas than in control sites, while ectoparasites were less common in Brasília's control site. Feather corticosterone and body condition were not significantly associated with haemosporidian presence, but higher corticosterone correlated with ectoparasite occurrence in control areas. Our results indicate that bird populations around airports exhibit reduced parasite prevalence, suggesting that highly modified environments alter parasite-host dynamics and shape parasite biodiversity. Future studies incorporating infection intensity and longitudinal sampling would help clarify whether urban settings suppress or restructure avian parasite communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.