ArticleApplied biochemistry and biotechnology2025
Industrial Production of PEGylated L-asparaginase: Process Design and Techno-economic Assessment Through Simulation.
Article in Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
L-asparaginase is a biopharmaceutical enzyme used as a first-line treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Despite its clinical relevance, only a limited number of microbially produced L-asparaginase formulations are commercially available. Among these, PEGylated versions are preferred due to their reduced dosing frequency and lower incidence of side effects. However, PEGylated enzymes are significantly more expensive to produce, and techno-economic evaluations of such products remain scarce in the literature. This study presents a conceptual process design and a techno-economic analysis, conducted through simulation, for the production of PEGylated L-asparaginase. Based on the scale-up of process parameters developed by our research group, multiple production scenarios were evaluated. The simulation of different fermentation modes and final biomass concentration revealed key cost drivers, including biomass yield, PEGylation reagent cost, and the efficiency of unreacted enzyme removal during purification. In the best-performing scenario, which employed fed-batch fermentation with 40 g/L of biomass, the unit production cost (UPC) of L-asparaginase was estimated at USD 5.81 per mg. Among all factors, plant depreciation and the cost of mPEG-NHS were identified as the most influential factors on the UPC. The findings support the feasibility of developing small-scale biopharmaceutical production facilities aimed at enhancing local self-sufficiency and reducing vulnerability to global supply chain disruptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41074926What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.