ReviewJournal of internal medicine2025
Health inequalities in the Nordic countries: A comparative overview and update.
Review in Journal of internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Variation in chemotherapy use across healthcare regions in Sweden and its impact on prognosis in women with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic inequality in adolescent life satisfaction: temporal trends and age- and sex-specific patterns from the Norwegian Health Behaviour in School-aged Children surveys, 2002-2018.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Health inequalities in the Nordic countries: A comparative overview and update.Journal of internal medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this article, we present the state-of-the-art on socioeconomic health inequalities with a focus on the Nordic countries. Health inequalities have increased over time and can be observed for both mortality and morbidity. We show that cross-national comparisons reveal surprisingly high inequalities in the Nordic countries. It is now well established that health and mortality inequalities prevail also at older ages. We show, with data from Sweden, that the interpretation of how mortality inequalities evolve over the life course is markedly different depending on whether we focus on absolute or relative inequalities. Although there is a consensus on basic descriptive facts, disagreements on how these facts are best explained and why they persist and even increase remain. We present a general discussion on how to explain health inequalities, as well as a discussion on why patterns may differ between European regions and across the life course. We introduce a framework for understanding health inequalities, fundamental cause theory and discuss to what extent the evidence aligns with the theory. We review contemporary discussions on health inequalities in light of recent evidence based on novel methods for causal inference. We argue that health inequalities have important ramifications for population health regardless of whether they are primarily shaped by social causation or social selection and end by noting that as modern societies aspire to become more meritocratic, it is possible that socioeconomic position becomes increasingly important for health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.