ArticleThe clinical teacher2025
Embedding Patient and Public Involvement in Health Professions Education: Bridging Novelty and Normalisation.
Article in The clinical teacher, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Embedding Patient and Public Involvement in Health Professions Education: Bridging Novelty and Normalisation.The clinical teacher · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patient and public involvement (PPI) in health professional education (HPE) varies widely across institutions, reflecting different stages of implementation and integration. While some have successfully normalised PPI, in other HPE settings, it remains a novel concept. This variability highlights the need for a systematic approach to embedding PPI sustainably across HPE. We introduce normalisation process theory (NPT) as a framework to understand and enhance how PPI becomes embedded in HPE settings. In this paper, NPT offers educators a structured approach to reflect on their current PPI practices, identify areas for improvement and develop strategies for sustainable implementation. By exploring the mechanisms of coherence, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring, we aim to equip readers with tools to enhance the integration and impact of PPI within their unique educational environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.