ArticleJournal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG2026
Robustness of a convolutional neural network trained on dermoscopic images and challenged with close-up images.
Article in Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesDeep learning-convolutional neural networks (DL-CNNs) have demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy within the domain of dermoscopy. However, many clinical settings lack dermoscopic devices, requiring reliance on close-up images. This study evaluates the robustness of a DL-CNN trained on dermoscopic images when challenged with close-up images.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, the DL-CNN Moleanalyzer pro, trained on 129,487 dermoscopic images, was tested on 350 skin lesions, each imaged both clinically and dermoscopically. Histopathology (89.4%) or expert consensus with a two-year follow-up (10.6%) served as the reference standard. Primary outcomes included sensitivity, specificity, and the receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve (ROC-AUC).
resultsFor dermoscopic images, the DL-CNN achieved a sensitivity of 88.2% (95% CI: 82.9%-92.0%), specificity of 69.0% (61.4%-75.8%), and a ROC-AUC of 0.866 (0.860-0.873). For close-up images of the same lesions, sensitivity decreased to 60.5% (53.5%-67.1%, p < 0.001), while specificity increased to 79.4% (72.3%-85.0%, p = 0.027). The ROC-AUC for close-up images was 0.780 (0.772-0.790, p = 0.003).
conclusionsOur findings highlight the diagnostic limitations of applying DL-CNNs trained on dermoscopic images to close-up images, with reduced sensitivity but increased specificity. The results emphasize the need to improve cross-domain adaptability. Fine-tuning of DL-CNNs on clinical images may enhance real-world diagnostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.