ArticleTransfusion2026
Clinical implications of imlifidase interference in antibody screening and transfusion management.
Article in Transfusion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Therapeutic biologics interference in serological and pre-transfusion testing.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImlifidase has received conditional approval from the EMA for desensitizing deceased donor kidney transplant recipients. It works by cleaving IgG into F(ab') CASE REPORT: We present the case of a 55-year-old male who underwent desensitization for an HLA-incompatible deceased-donor kidney transplantation. The patient had a documented history of clinically relevant alloantibodies against erythrocyte antigens. Specifically, anti-K alloantibodies were identified by pre-treatment alloantibody screening prior to the initiation of imlifidase therapy. Following imlifidase treatment, alloantibody screening prior to blood transfusion returned a false-negative result, likely due to the elimination of IgG alloantibodies by imlifidase. Despite the elimination of detectable alloantibodies, transfusion management was guided by the patient's documented antibody history from a national registry, ensuring the administration of antigen-compatible blood transfusions.
conclusionTo our knowledge, this represents the first documented case demonstrating that imlifidase treatment may interfere with alloantibody screening in routine blood transfusion diagnostics. False-negative results may mask clinically relevant alloantibodies, thereby increasing the risk of incompatible transfusions and delayed hemolytic reactions. This highlights the need for caution when interpreting alloantibody screening results in imlifidase-treated patients and calls for future guidelines or recommendations to manage potential interference, minimizing risks and ensuring patient safety in blood transfusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.