ReviewJournal of sleep research2025
Polysomnography in Transition: Reassessing Its Role in the Future of Sleep Medicine.
Review in Journal of sleep research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sleep, rest-activity rhythm, cognitive and emotional symptoms in adult ADHD: unraveling the links with an actimetry-based approach.BMC psychiatry · 2026Trial
- A novel, wearable, in-ear EEG technology to assess sleep and daytime sleepiness.Bioelectronic medicine · 2026Article
- Automated sleep stage and event detection algorithms using quality-controlled polysomnography annotations.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026Article
- Polysomnography in Transition: Reassessing Its Role in the Future of Sleep Medicine.Journal of sleep research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PSG, a cornerstone diagnostic instrument in sleep medicine, is recommended for the diagnosis of numerous sleep disorders and might be used as a benchmark for evaluating therapeutical effectiveness. However, PSG has its limitations, and its usefulness in the future warrants reappraisal. First, it is a complex test that requires highly-trained personnel to correctly place the electrodes, monitor the patient, and manually analyse the data. This constitutes a significant economic burden for both society and healthcare systems. PSG also presents few technical limitations: variability of data between nights and variable reliability of scoring between readers. The results given to patients are also limited to the macrostructure of sleep, risking the loss of important information that escapes detection when relying solely on polysomnographic evaluation based on macro sleep stages. The current sleep scoring guidelines raise some doubts about their ability to capture the dynamic and complex nature of human sleep in both clinical and physiological contexts. On the other hand, advanced PSG analysis can provide key information for diagnosis particularly through the microstructural analysis of NREM oscillatory pattern, characterisation of spindles and slow waves, eye movement density, spectrum analysis with hypnodensity and sleep propensity with odd ratio products (ORP). These elements provide a better understanding of the differences between insomnia and poor sleep perception. Furthermore, these methods take into account the dynamics of sleep states, going beyond the mere distinction of sleep into macro stages, which poorly reflects the dynamic nature of sleep itself and including in the assessment of sleep function all the complex associations that sleep itself has with autonomic and cardiorespiratory variables. These insights will transform the role of technicians and clinicians in PSG analysis, with a shift towards training in digital data analysis and algorithms to better inform patients about their PSG results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.