ArticleBiophysical journal2026
Automation and improvement of WBC mechanical profiling in deformability cytometry.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deformability cytometry (DC) is a powerful biophysical technique that enables cost-effective, high-throughput characterization of disease-associated changes in blood cell mechanics. Mechanical profiling of living white blood cells (WBCs) is particularly valuable due to their critical role in the immune response. However, reliably identifying and classifying WBC subtypes in a label-free manner remains a significant challenge. Until now, the analysis pipeline has relied on manual gating by trained experts, limiting scalability and reproducibility. In this study, we present a fully automated and generalizable framework for WBC classification in shear flow DC experiments, based on box filters and unsupervised clustering of cell populations. Both box filters and unsupervised clustering rely on cell shape features derived from high-accuracy segmentation and on cell texture features derived from bright-field images. This unsupervised approach not only improves reproducibility and reduces processing time but also overcomes key limitations of supervised models that require extensive training data and often suffer from reduced performance under varying imaging conditions. We validated our method by comparing cell features obtained through manual gating and automated classification across six experimental sets. These sets incorporated variations in blood donors, anticoagulants (EDTA and citrate), blood collection sources (capillary and venous), and device brightness settings. Each set included five repeated measurements. The results consistently confirmed the reliability and robustness of the method across all tested conditions and WBC types. Importantly, this automated pipeline enables the inclusion of WBCs with membrane protrusions-typically excluded from standard analyses-allowing for morphological characterization of potentially activated cells. Moreover, by using shape features derived from the original contour rather than the convex hull, we improve morphological accuracy and reduce measurement variability. This approach thus enhances the accuracy, consistency, and scalability of WBC mechanophenotyping and enables high-throughput analysis across large cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.