ArticleJournal of experimental botany2026
Methylome differences among barley inbreds and their association with genomic, transcriptomic, and phenotypic variation.
Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The role of methylation and structural variants in shaping the recombination landscape of barley.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epigenetic variation can play a crucial role in explaining the missing heritability of complex traits. To investigate genome-wide methylation in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare subsp. vulgare), we performed whole genome bisulfite sequencing on 23 parental inbreds from a community resource for genetic mapping. Our objectives were to characterize methylation variation, explore its association with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and examine links to gene expression. The barley genome showed high average methylation levels of 88.6%, 58.1%, and 1.4% in the CpG, CHG, and CHH contexts, respectively. We identified nearly 500 000 differentially methylated regions (DMRs), with 64%, 64%, and 83% of DMRs in CpG, CHG, and CHH contexts, respectively, not associated with sequence variation. Around 6% of all DMRs showed significant associations with gene expression, with the direction of the correlations varying based on the DMR's location relative to the gene with a recognizable pattern. We exemplified this association between DNA methylation and gene expression on the known flowering promoting gene VRN-H1, identifying a highly methylated epiallele linked to earlier flowering. Lastly, methylation improved the prediction abilities of genomic prediction models for various traits, outperforming models based solely on SNPs and gene expression. These findings emphasize the independent role of DNA methylation to sequence variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.