ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025
Postpartum hemorrhage after SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy: A Scandinavian register-based cohort study.
Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preparedness for maternal and offspring health surveillance in pandemics: Lessons learned from studies on COVID-19 using Scandinavian registry data.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Postpartum hemorrhage after SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy: A Scandinavian register-based cohort study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe aim was to evaluate whether SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy was associated with severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), as SARS-CoV-2 infection has been shown to affect the coagulation system. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn this national register-based cohort study in Sweden, Denmark, and Norway, we studied the association between severe PPH according to a registered positive test for SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy between March 1, 2020 and March 31, 2023 using logistic regression analyses to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Country-specific estimates of association were combined in random effects meta-analyses. The primary outcome was severe PPH, defined as a blood loss >1500 mL and/or receiving a blood transfusion.
resultsWe included 542 394 singleton deliveries (264 804 in Sweden, 143 775 in Denmark, and 133 815 in Norway), of which 62 606 women (11%) had a positive SARS-CoV-2 test during pregnancy, and 20 786 (3.8%) deliveries were registered with a severe PPH. Overall, we observed no association between testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy and severe PPH (combined adjusted OR 1.04; 95% CI: 0.96-1.12). The results were similar for different calendar periods corresponding to dominant SARS-CoV-2 variants. We did, however, observe an association between severe PPH and women testing positive within 7 days before delivery (combined adjusted OR 1.30; 95% CI: 1.10-1.53).
conclusionsThere was no association identified between SARS-CoV-2 test positivity and PPH of >1500 mL and/or blood transfusion in pregnant women from three Scandinavian countries. However, we observed a 30% higher odds of severe PPH among pregnant women who tested positive within one week before delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.