Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41074222›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2025

The role of social support in NCD IHSP uptake among industrial workers: a quantitative approach.

Nasrul Zaman, Yuseva Sariati, Umi Salmah, Fahrun Nur Rosyid, Atik Badi'ah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nasrul ZamanDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia. nasrulzaman@usk.ac.id.
Yuseva SariatiMidwifery Department Medical Faculty, Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia.
Umi SalmahPublic Health Faculty, North Sumatera University, North Sumatera, Medan, Indonesia.
Fahrun Nur RosyidDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Central Java, Surakarta, Indonesia.
Atik Badi'ahDiploma III Nursing Study Program, Department of Nursing, Yogyakarta Health Polytechnic, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study analyzes the mediating role of perceived benefits and barriers in the relationship between social support and the utilization of Non-Communicable Disease (NCD) Integrated Health Service Posts (IHSP) among industrial workers in Indonesia. The goal is to provide strong empirical evidence to inform the development of more effective, ecosystem-based occupational health interventions by understanding the perceptual mechanisms through which social support influences the uptake of health services in this high-risk population. DESCRIPTION OF

resultsThe study found that social support significantly increased the perception of benefits (β = 0.869) while simultaneously lowering perceived barriers (β = -0.613). Perceived benefits strongly predicted the use of NCD services (β = 0.612), while the influence of perceived barriers on service use was statistically insignificant. These results confirm the presence of asymmetric mediation, where the influence of social support on service utilization is predominantly channelled through strengthening the perception of benefits rather than simply reducing barriers. This implies that social support functions by resolving barriers at an "upstream" level, making the enhanced perception of benefits the primary driver for service uptake.

Indexed as

Noncommunicable DiseasesOccupational Health ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CareSocial SupportAdultFemaleHumansIndonesiaMaleMiddle AgedIndustrial workersNon-communicable diseasesPerceived barriersPerceived benefitsSocial support

Identifiers

PMID41074222
PMCPMC12512906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.