ArticleTrials2025
Total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis versus subtotal colectomy with cecal-rectal anastomosis for slow transit constipation: protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial (STOPS trial).
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05352074 (STOPS Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
STOPS Trial: A Multicentre Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing Total Colectomy With Ileorectal Anastomosis Versus Subtotal Colectomy With Cecal-rectal Anastomosis for Slow Transit Constipation
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic caecorectal anastomosis versus total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis for refractory slow-transit constipation: a comparative analysis.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic total colectomy, ileal J-pouch, and ileorectal anastomosis in the treatment of slow transit constipation: a case report (with video).International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic-assisted subtotal colectomy cecal-rectal anastomosis for redundant colon-associated slow-transit constipation: a single-center retrospective case series with long-term follow-up.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundConstipation, a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder, affects 10%-15% of adults in the USA and approximately 8.2% of China's general population. Slow transit constipation (STC), accounting for 15%-42% of constipation cases, is defined by impaired colonic motility. For patients refractory to conservative treatment who experience chronic, intractable symptoms and diminished quality of life, surgical intervention becomes the treatment of last resort. The primary surgical approach for STC has traditionally been total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (TC-IRA). However, over the past two decades, subtotal colectomy with cecorectal anastomosis (SC-CRA) has gained increasing attention among clinicians due to its potential to reduce postoperative diarrhea. Despite this advantage, SC-CRA is also associated with concerns regarding an increased risk of recurrent constipation. The debate surrounding which approach is superior persists. This study aims to resolve this controversy through a comparative analysis of TC-IRA and SC-CRA, evaluating their therapeutic efficacy and safety profiles in refractory STC.
methodsThe STOPS trial is a prospective, randomized, multicenter-controlled clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of TC-IRA versus SC-CRA in treating patients with STC. After screening for eligibility and obtaining informed consent, a total of 252 adult patients will be randomized into two groups in a 1:1 ratio after assuring that none of the exclusion criteria is present. The primary outcome is the Wexner Constipation Score. The secondary outcomes include operative time, conversion rates, blood loss, short- and long-term complications, bowel movements, abdominal pain, bloating, straining, enema use, laxative use, Wexner Incontinence Score, gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI), 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and satisfaction. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively. DISCUSSION: This trial will be the first and largest randomized clinical trial to assess whether TC-IRA or SC-CRA should be the standardized surgical treatment for STC in terms of WCS outcomes. We hope that its findings will not only demonstrate the value of the surgical procedure in the treatment of STC, but also provide more reliable clinical evidence for further standardization of STC surgical treatment.
trial registrationSTOPS Trial: A Multicentre Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing Total Colectomy with Ileorectal Anastomosis Versus Subtotal Colectomy with Cecal-rectal Anastomosis for Slow Transit Constipation ( http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05352074 ). Registry identifier: NCT05352074. Registration date: April 3, 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.