Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41074219›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2025

Sustainable deep learning-based breast lesion segmentation: impact of breast region segmentation on performance.

Sam Narimani, Solveig Roth Hoff, Kathinka Dæhli Kurz, Kjell-Inge Gjesdal, Jürgen Geisler, Endre Grøvik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Insertion Network for Image Sequence Correspondence Building.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sam NarimaniDepartment of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. sam.narimania@gmail.com.
Solveig Roth HoffDepartment of Radiology, More og Romsdal Hospital Trust, Aalesund, Norway.
Kathinka Dæhli KurzStavanger Medical Imaging Group, Radiology Department, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Kjell-Inge GjesdalDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Akershus University Hospital, Lorenskog, Norway.
Jürgen GeislerInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Lorenskog, Norway.
Endre GrøvikDepartment of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSegmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is critical for effective diagnosis. This study investigates the impact of breast region segmentation (BRS) on the performance of deep learning-based breast lesion segmentation (BLS) in breast DCE-MRI.

methodsThe study utilized the Stavanger Dataset, comprising 59 DCE-MRI scans, and employed the UNet++ architecture as the segmentation model. Four experimental approaches were designed to assess the influence of BRS on BLS: (1) Whole Volume (WV) without BRS, (2) WV with BRS, (3) BRS applied only to Selected Lesion-containing Slices (SLS), and (4) BRS applied to an Optimal Volume (OV). Data augmentation and oversampling techniques were implemented to address dataset limitations and enhance model generalizability. A systematic method was employed to determine OV sizes for patient's DCE-MRI images ensuring full lesion inclusion. Model training and validation were conducted using a hybrid loss function-comprising Dice loss, focal loss, and cross-entropy loss-and a five-fold cross-validation strategy. Final evaluations were performed on a randomly split test dataset for each of the four approaches.

resultsThe findings indicate that applying BRS significantly enhances model performance. The most notable improvement was observed in the fourth approach, BRS with OV, which achieved approximately a 50% increase in segmentation accuracy compared to the non-BRS baseline. Furthermore, the BRS with OV approach resulted in a substantial reduction in computational energy consumption-up to 450%, highlighting its potential as an environmentally sustainable solution for large-scale applications.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultBreastContrast MediaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedContrast MediaBreast lesion segmentationBreast region segmentationDCE-MRIDeep learning

Identifiers

PMID41074219
PMCPMC12513079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.