Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41074170›Full record

Observational studyJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025

Divided attention and manual visuomotor control in stroke: a combined dual-task and eye movement study.

Elisa Dziezuk, Quentin Le Boterff, Coralie Van Ravestyn, Solène Mairesse, Sonia Hamdoun, David Calvet, Lina Daghsen, Loïc Carment, Charlotte Rosso, Marc A Maier and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05454748 (Simultaneous Recording of Cognitive and Motor Functions After Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05454748 completednot on this map

Simultaneous Recording of Cognitive and Motor Functions After Stroke : Dissociation of Motor and Cognitive Deficits

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre Hospitalier St AnneRan2022 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsStroke
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Elisa DziezukUniversité Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, Paris, 75014, France. elisa.dziezuk@gmail.com.
Quentin Le BoterffUniversité Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, Paris, 75014, France.
Coralie Van RavestynNeurology Department, Stroke Unit, UCLouvain, CHU UCL Namur (Godinne), Yvoir, Belgium.
Solène MairesseGHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Université Paris Cité, INSERM U1266, Paris, France.
Sonia HamdounUniversité Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, Paris, 75014, France.
David CalvetUniversité Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, Paris, 75014, France.
Lina DaghsenSorbonne Université, Institut du cerveau, INSERM U1127, CNRS UMR 7225, APHP Urgences Cérébro-Vasculaires, Paris, 75006, France.
Loïc CarmentUniversité Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, Paris, 75014, France.
Charlotte RossoSorbonne Université, Institut du cerveau, INSERM U1127, CNRS UMR 7225, APHP Urgences Cérébro-Vasculaires, Paris, 75006, France.
Marc A MaierUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, Saints-Pères Paris Institute for the Neurosciences, Paris, F-75006, France.
Guillaume TurcUniversité Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, Paris, 75014, France.
Jean-Louis MasUniversité Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, Paris, 75014, France.
Påvel G LindbergUniversité Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, Paris, 75014, France.

Funding

GHU Paris Psychiatry and Neurosciences and ANR ANR-22-CE19-0011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDaily manual tasks require cognitive-motor interactions. There is limited research on cognitive-motor dual-tasks involving the upper extremity. In this study we used a manual visuomotor dual-task to measure post-stroke cognitive-motor impairments. Given previous evidence of impaired cognitive-motor interaction in stroke we hypothesized that the presence of enhanced dual-task cognitive load will impact motor performance in stroke patients. We also hypothesized that this dual-task effect would be greater in stroke patients compared to healthy controls. We also explored whether cognitive-motor impairments observed in these single- and dual-task conditions would relate to deficits in manual dexterity.

methods30 chronic stroke participants (29.77 ± 35.39 months post-stroke) with mild-to-moderate hemiparesis without cognitive impairment (global screening test) and 30 age-matched healthy subjects performed a visuomotor grip force-tracking task in single- and dual-task conditions, requiring divided attention (resisting visual distraction) and working memory (mental addition of transiently displayed numbers). Gaze was simultaneously recorded to probe cognitive performance through saccades. Dexterity impairments were separately quantified using a kinetic device.

resultsStroke patients had increased visuomotor tracking error but did not show significantly increased change in visuomotor tracking error during the dual-task, with no significant difference between single task condition vs. divided attention or vs. working memory dual-task conditions. In contrast, age-matched healthy controls did show the expected difference with significantly higher dual-task force-tracking error. The between-group analysis only revealed a significant group difference (Stroke vs. Control) with stroke patients producing twice as much tracking error in both single and dual-task conditions. Stroke participants showed significantly reduced dual-task saccade modulation, with a reduced difference in saccades to displayed numbers (similar in both groups) vs. to distractors (higher in stroke) (median ± IQR: stroke 14.6 ± 18.75%; controls: 26.4 ± 32.41%). Non-inhibited saccades to distractors explained certain dexterity group differences (force control and timing of finger movements).

conclusionThe visuomotor force-tracking error, although increased, did not show enhanced cognitive-motor interaction in stroke. However, the task-related saccade analysis did detect impaired divided attention post-stroke, that may contribute to impaired dexterity, particularly in tasks requiring on-line sensorimotor integration. Upper limb dual-tasking practice may be relevant for engaging attention and enhancing post-stroke activities in daily life. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05454748.

Indexed as

AttentionEye MovementsPsychomotor PerformanceStrokeAdultAgedFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermMiddle AgedParesisAttentionForce-trackingManual dexterityStrokeVisuomotor dual-taskWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID41074170
PMCPMC12512275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.