ArticleBMC nursing2025
Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the nurse team resilience scale in the context of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Turkish adaptation of the Nurse Team Resilience Scale in public health emergencies: a validity and reliability study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Psychometric Validation of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 10 in Peruvian Nurses and Its Association with Stress and Empathy.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is one of the most stressful situations in emergency medicine, where nurses play a central role and are exposed to significant levels of stress. Among the factors that can maintain team cohesion and performance, enabling effective adaptation to changes, risk factors, and stressors, is nursing team resilience. The present study aimed to conduct a Persian translation and psychometric evaluation of the Nursing Team Resilience Scale in the context of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
methodsThis cross-sectional methodological study was conducted between June 2024 and March 2025 in Gonabad and Bajestan in Iran, on 360 nurses using convenience sampling method. For translation process, the Forward-Backward method was used. Face validity was performed on 10 nurses, and the opinions of 10 experts in the field of nursing and psychometrics of the tool were used for content validity, and CVR and CVI values were calculated. Construct validity was examined using exploratory factor analysis (sample: 160) and confirmatory factor analysis (sample: 200).To assess reliability, two indices were calculated: internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 22 and AMOS version 24.
resultsNo items were removed during the face and content validity assessments; only minor revisions were applied. the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) index was found to be 0.76, indicating adequate sampling adequacy. The result of Bartlett’s test of sphericity was significant (χ² = 298.29, df = 28, p < 0.001), confirming the suitability of the data for factor analysis. In Exploratory factor analysis, 2 factors were extracted that explained 41.29% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) demonstrated good fit for the two-factor model (AGFI = 0.911, CFI = 0.938, PCFI = 0.637, RMSEA = 0.071, PNFI = 0.602, GFI = 0.953, IFI = 0.940, and RMR = 0.040). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the entire questionnaire was 0.75 and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.95.
conclusionThe results of the present study demonstrated that the Persian version of Nursing Team Resilience Scale in the context of cardiopulmonary resuscitation has satisfactory validity and reliability. This instrument demonstrates strong potential for use as a standardized tool in assessing nursing team resilience among Iranian nurses, particularly in high-stress settings like CPR. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.