ArticleBMC medical education2025
Evaluating perspectives and attitudes towards the South African medical internship programme.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
South Africa’s healthcare system faces a quadruple burden of disease and marked social inequalities, necessitating an increased number of well-trained medical personnel. The internship period, a two-year programme where junior doctors transition from medical school to professional practice, is central to this. However, limited data exist on its effectiveness and suitability. Methods This survey-based study explored the expectations and perceptions of the South African internship programme among stakeholders in the Western Cape province.Results A total of 82 individuals responded, including 63 medical interns and 19 independent doctors and specialists (intern curators and heads of department). The majority of interns expected to gain procedural skills (n=57, 90%), diagnostic skills (n=56, 89%), and meaningful interaction with senior colleagues to enhance learning (n=53, 84%). Most interns felt their rotations prepared them for independent practice: family medicine (96%), anaesthesia (94%), psychiatry and mental health (86%), internal medicine (81%), paediatrics (76%), and obstetrics and gynaecology (71%). Only 38% felt surgery prepared them adequately. Respondents highlighted that shortening this rotation would further compromise readiness for independent practice.Regarding internship length, 68% believed reducing the current two-year programme to one year would be harmful, while 9% perceived no harm and 13% were unsure. If shortened, 83% expected less clinical exposure and 75% anticipated reduced teaching time. A 24-month programme was consistently viewed as offering greater benefit for skills acquisition than any shorter alternative.Conclusion The South African internship programme is largely regarded by interns and supervisors as effective in preparing junior doctors for independent practice. However, the surgery rotation is widely seen as insufficient. Acquisition of procedural and diagnostic skills remains a key priority and should continue to guide programme design. Most stakeholders favour maintaining the two-year structure, as it provides more substantial clinical exposure and training benefits than a shortened internship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.