ReviewJournal of eating disorders2025
Meal plan inclusions and exclusions in the inpatient, outpatient and community setting for adolescent and adult eating disorder care: a scoping review.
Review in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimMinimal research has been conducted on meal plan food exclusions and there is limited evidence to guide introduction of feared foods in eating disorder treatment. This scoping review aimed to explore the evidence on food inclusion and exclusions in inpatient, outpatient, and community settings for adolescents and adults.
methodsA scoping review was performed and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Scoping Review guidelines. All English language primary research studies from the earliest time point exploring meal plan exclusions in people aged > 12 years old with an eating disorder were included. The search was conducted in January 2025 in six databases with no date limits.
resultsOf the 3693 studies screened, eight studies were included. Non-randomised intervention studies comprised 50% (n = 4), 62% (n = 5) of studies involved consumers and 38% (n = 3) were clinician-led. Clinician-led practices varied with most permitting exclusions for religious or medical reasons i.e. allergy, or lifelong dislikes. Vegetarianism and veganism were inconsistently permitted amongst clinicians. Various meal planning approaches were utilised to improve dietary variety including meal preparation (n = 1), menu planning (n = 2), and food cards (n = 2) in consumer-led studies.
conclusionThis review outlined the various approaches utilised in meal plan exclusion rationale across inpatient, outpatient, and community settings. Findings highlight there is limited literature exploring meal plan exclusion rationale in the treatment of eating disorders. Of the available literature, no consensus could be concluded due to high heterogeneity. Evidence-based practice recommendations for meal plan exclusions should be included in future eating disorder guidelines to facilitate consistency in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.