ArticleBMC public health2025
Changes in the frequency of food orders and food choices on meal delivery apps during the COVID-19 pandemic in a Brazilian metropolitan region.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe rise of the digital food environment, especially through meal delivery apps, reshapes food consumption habits amid convenience- and pandemic-driven changes. We aimed to describe changes in both frequency of food purchase and food choices made in meal delivery apps during the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsA web-based survey was conducted between May and September 2020 using virtual chain sampling with 986 adults residing in the metropolitan region of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The online questionnaire, developed in Google Forms, collected data on sociodemographic characteristics, self-rated health, diet quality, and the frequency of food ordering and food choices via meal delivery apps. Participants were categorized according to their usage frequency and changes in usage frequency during the pandemic. Post-stratification weighting was applied based on sex, age, and education level. Descriptive analyses were stratified by usage frequency categories. Pearson’s χ² test and McNemar’s test were used for statistical comparisons.
results59.4% of meal delivery app users were female; 54.7% were aged under 44; 78.6% had a medium level of education. During the pandemic, there was an increase in the frequency of food purchases in meal delivery apps, more than half of the population was using meal delivery apps more frequently, and 15% of the occasional customers (less than once a week) turned into regular ones (once a week or more). The top three items ordered, before or during the pandemic, were fast food, soda, and handmade hamburgers or pizzas. The main items ordered by people who became occasional users were dishes based on animal protein and fast food. A significant proportion of them stopped ordering fast food (5%), soda (9%), international cuisine (9%), and traditional Brazilian meals (8%) during the pandemic. The main orders by people who became regular users were fast food and soda. Respectively, 17%, 13% and 10% of them started ordering traditional Brazilian meals, dishes based on animal protein and desserts.
conclusionsSuch platforms were mainly used to buy meals based on ultra-processed foods at both moments, even among people who also used them to purchase healthy options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.