ArticleHealth research policy and systems2025
Developing a Canadian midwifery research priority framework: a Delphi consensus study.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGlobally, there is a commitment to evidence informed midwifery practice. In Canada, the midwifery profession has grown significantly over the past three decades, yet Canadian midwifery research lacks coordination and infrastructure. Developing a unified research agenda to address emerging clinical, population and policy challenges is essential for advancing research capacity building.
methodsThis study employed a modified Delphi technique, a robust consensus-seeking method, to identify national research priorities for Canadian midwifery. The process included a scoping review, a cross-sectional national survey, regional focus groups and follow-up surveys. Participants included midwives, researchers, service users, students and policymakers. Data were analysed using both qualitative and quantitative methods to identify and rank priority areas.
resultsThe study identified three primary research priority areas: organizing models of care, optimizing reproductive care and strengthening the profession. Key themes included access to care, expanding midwifery roles, informed choice and addressing systemic barriers. Facilitating factors such as effective collaboration, policy changes and building research capacity were also highlighted. The final framework emphasizes the need for coordinated efforts to enhance the quality and accessibility of midwifery services across Canada.
conclusionsThe findings underscore the importance of a coordinated national research agenda to support the growth and development of midwifery in Canada. By focusing on identified priority areas and facilitating factors, the midwifery profession can continue to provide high-quality, equitable care. The study's methodology and results can inform similar efforts globally, promoting the integration of midwifery care into health systems worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.