ArticleBMC oral health2025
Semi-automatic detection of anteriorly displaced temporomandibular joint discs in magnetic resonance images using machine learning.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate diagnosis of anterior disc displacement (ADD) is essential for managing temporomandibular joint disorders (TMJ). This study employed machine learning (ML) to automatically detect anteriorly displaced TMJ discs in magnetic resonance images (MRI).
methodsThis retrospective study included patients with TMJ disorders who visited the Hospital between January 2023 and June 2024. Five machine learning models-decision tree (DT), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and logistic regression (LR)-were utilized to train and validate radiomics data derived from TMJ imaging. Model performance was assessed using an 8:2 train-test split, evaluating accuracy with metrics such as area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1 score. After manual delineation of TMJ ROIs by an experienced radiologist (serving as reference standard), radiomic feature extraction included first-order statistics, size- and shape-based features, and texture features.The open-phase, close-phase, and open and close fusion radiomics image features were evaluated separately.
resultsThe study analyzed 382 TMJs from 191 patients, comprising 214 normal joints and 168 abnormal joints. The fusion radiomics model using five classifiers surpassed both open-phase and close-phase models, demonstrating superior performance in both training and validation cohorts. The fusion radiomics model consistently outperformed single-phase analyses across both diagnostic tasks. For normal vs. abnormal TMJ discrimination, the Random Forest (RF) classifier demonstrated robust performance with AUCs of 0.889 (95% CI: 0.854-0.924) in training and 0.874 (95% CI: 0.799-0.948) in validation.Complete performance metrics for all five classifiers are detailed in the main text.
conclusionsThe fusion radiomics model effectively distinguished normal from abnormal joints and differentiated between ADDwR and ADDwoR, supporting personalized treatment planning. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.