Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41073992›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Nurse-led telemedicine versus in-person lactation support for breastfeeding initiation in mothers of low-birth-weight infants: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.

Osama Mohamed Elsayed Ramadan, Afrah Madyan Alshammari, Abeer Nuwayfi Alruwaili, Nadia Bassuoni Elsharkawy, Ali Alhaiti, Nagwa Ibrahim Mabrouk Baraka

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06652386 (Nurse-Led Telemedicine Versus In-Person Lactation Support for Breastfeeding Initiation in Mothers of Low-Birth-Weight Infants), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06652386 nacompletednot on this map

Nurse-Led Telemedicine Versus In-Person Lactation Support for Breastfeeding Initiation in Mothers of Low-Birth-Weight Infants: A Non-inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorJouf UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled200ConditionsNurse's Role, Telemedicine, Lactation, BreastfeedingArmsTelemedicine Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Osama Mohamed Elsayed RamadanDepartment of Maternity and Pediatric Health Nursing, College of Nursing, Jouf University, Sakaka, 72388, Saudi Arabia. omramadan@ju.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9616-8590
Afrah Madyan AlshammariDepartment of Maternity and Pediatric Health Nursing, College of Nursing, Jouf University, Sakaka, 72388, Saudi Arabia.
Abeer Nuwayfi AlruwailiDepartment of Nursing Administration and Education, College of Nursing, Jouf University, Sakaka, 72388, Saudi Arabia.
Nadia Bassuoni ElsharkawyDepartment of Maternity and Pediatric Health Nursing, College of Nursing, Jouf University, Sakaka, 72388, Saudi Arabia.
Ali AlhaitiDepartment of Nursing, College of Applied Sciences, Almaarefa University, Riyadh, Diriyah, 13713, Saudi Arabia.
Nagwa Ibrahim Mabrouk BarakaDepartment of Pediatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Tanta University, Tanta, 31527, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly breastfeeding initiation is crucial for low-birth-weight (LBW) infants, yet in-person lactation support may be limited in resource-poor settings. Telemedicine holds promise but lacks robust comparative evidence with traditional care.

objectiveTo evaluate whether nurse-led telemedicine is non-inferior to in-person support on routine early-initiation performance in LBW/NICU settings, and to describe breastfeeding processes within 24 h postpartum.

methodsThis parallel-group, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial included 200 mothers of LBW infants admitted to four neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Egypt. Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive nurse-led telemedicine or standard in-person lactation support. Primary Process Outcome: Direct Breastfeeding Initiation within 1 Hour, assessed against a 5% non-inferiority margin. Secondary outcomes of maternal self-efficacy, satisfaction, state anxiety, and infant growth parameters were measured at baseline, one week, and one month postpartum. Analyses followed both intention-to-treat and per-protocol approaches.

resultsBreastfeeding initiation occurred in 65% of mothers in the telemedicine group versus 70% in the in-person group, confirming non-inferiority (p = 0.04). Although in-person support provided a minor short-term advantage in maternal self-efficacy at one week (49.2 ± 6.5 vs. 47.5 ± 7.2, p = 0.03), scores converged by one month (p = 0.45). Telemedicine participants reported higher satisfaction with accessibility (p = 0.03), while overall support quality, anxiety reduction, and infant growth measures were comparable between groups. Parity and socioeconomic status independently predicted breastfeeding initiation (p < 0.01).

conclusionsNurse-led telemedicine did not reduce first-hour initiation relative to in-person support; given stabilization protocols in LBW/NICU care, this endpoint functions as a process benchmark rather than a direct target of the support modality. Although in-person support may offer early advantages in maternal self-efficacy, telemedicine effectively sustains key outcomes over time and can expand equitable breastfeeding support in regions with limited healthcare resources.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06652386, Registered 22 October 2024.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingInfant, Low Birth WeightPostnatal CareTelemedicineAdultEgyptFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLactationMothersPatient SatisfactionSelf EfficacyBreastfeeding initiationLactation supportLow-birth-weight infantsNon-inferiorityRandomized controlled trialTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID41073992
PMCPMC12512732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.