Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41073988›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2025

Prevalence of dermatophytosis in cats and dogs in türkiye: dominance of Microsporum canis and first detection of Trichophyton rubrum.

Gokcenur Sanioglu Golen, Aslı Balevi, Ali Uslu, Kadir Akar, Melih Taşmertek, Zeki Aras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gokcenur Sanioglu GolenDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Aksaray University, Aksaray, Türkiye. gokcenursanioglu@aksaray.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9950-330X
Aslı BaleviDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Selçuk University, Konya, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7266-1049
Ali UsluDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Selçuk University, Konya, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8319-831X
Kadir AkarDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0894-7357
Melih TaşmertekDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Aksaray University, Aksaray, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-6655-8823
Zeki ArasDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Aksaray University, Aksaray, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4564-2077

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDermatophytosis is a fungal infection that can be zoonotic, with transmission occurring in both directions between humans and companion animals, particularly in settings involving close contact. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and identify the causative agents of dermatophytosis in dogs and cats using conventional and molecular diagnostic methods. A total of 150 animals with dermatological lesions were sampled, including 105 cats and 45 dogs from both household and shelter environments. This cross-sectional study employed direct microscopy and fungal culture as the initial diagnostic methods. PCR targeting the CHS1 gene was subsequently performed on fungal isolates obtained from 38 culture-positive samples, followed by species-specific amplification to identify Microsporum canis and Trichophyton rubrum. For molecular identification, DNA was extracted from pure cultures derived from hair, skin scrapings, and nail specimens. ITS region sequencing was also performed on two of the PCR-confirmed T. rubrum isolates. Prevalence was compared across animal species, age groups and living environments.

resultsDermatophytes were detected in 25.3% (38/150) of samples. In cats, only M. canis 76% (19/25) was identified. In dogs, both M. canis (5/13) and T. rubrum (2/13) were found. This represents the first report of T. rubrum in a dog in Türkiye, with ITS sequencing confirming > 99% identity to reference strains. Infection rates were significantly higher in animals under one year of age (p = 0.0097 ), while no statistically significant difference was observed between dogs and cats (p = 0.529). PCR and sequencing provided rapid and accurate identification.

conclusionsDermatophyte infections are more prevalent among juvenile animals and pose a growing zoonotic threat. Molecular diagnostics improve early detection and control strategies. These findings highlight the need for routine surveillance and reflect the critical importance of the One Health approach, which integrates human, animal, and environmental health to prevent and manage zoonotic disease transmission.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesDog DiseasesMicrosporumTineaTrichophytonAnimalsArthrodermataceaeCatsCross-Sectional StudiesDogsFemaleMalePolymerase Chain ReactionPrevalenceTurkeyCompanion animalsDermatophytosisMicrosporum canisOne healthZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID41073988
PMCPMC12512487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.