ArticleBMC biology2025
Predator experience enhances giraffe vigilance to oxpecker alarm calls.
Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ecological Exposure History Shapes Giraffe Vigilance Responses to Anthropogenic Noise: A Multisite Playback Experiment.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Differential weighting of lion vocalizations and oxpecker alarm calls in giraffes.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral EcologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnimals often benefit from the alarm calls of other species to detect danger, but how such cues are integrated into vigilance strategies remains unclear. Giraffes (Giraffa spp.) rely on early threat detection to avoid ambush and are known hosts of red-billed oxpeckers (Buphagus erythrorhynchus), which form mutualistic associations with large mammals by feeding on ectoparasites and emitting alarm calls in response to approaching threats. While these calls are thought to provide early-warning benefits, it remains unclear how giraffes interpret them, and whether their responses vary with prior exposure to predation risk.
resultsWe conducted playback experiments across three giraffe populations differing in predator presence to test whether giraffes adjust vigilance in response to oxpecker alarm calls. Individuals in the predator-inhabited reserve maintained vigilance longer than those in predator-free areas, suggesting that prior exposure enhances responsiveness to alarm calls. Acoustic analyses revealed that oxpecker alarm calls are characterized by low harmonic-to-noise ratios, consistent with harsh, broadband signals that are known to enhance attention and urgency perception in alarm contexts. However, call structure alone did not explain vigilance responses; instead responses were modulated by ecological context, specifically whether giraffes lived in areas with or without lions.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that oxpeckers serve a sentinel-like function and that giraffes use their alarm calls as early-warning signals, with stronger responses observed in populations exposed to predators. This supports the idea that eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls can provide context-dependent benefits, with predator-experienced giraffes showing greater sensitivity to oxpecker alarms. By linking behavioral flexibility with ecological context, this study offers a framework for understanding how mutualistic communication systems adapt to changing predation pressures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.