ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Comparative efficacy of 200 mg versus 1200 mg of simethicone with 3 L polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for afternoon colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSimethicone (SIM) can enhance bowel preparation efficiency, but the optimal dose for patients undergoing afternoon colonoscopy is still unclear. This study compares bowel preparation efficiency and adenoma detection rate (ADR) between patients receiving 3 L of polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (PEG-ELS) with 200 mg SIM or 1200 mg SIM for afternoon colonoscopy.
methodThis prospective, randomized, and observer-blinded trial included consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy. It compared the effects of two SIM dosages (200 mg and 1200 mg) added to a 3 L PEG-ELS regimen. The primary outcome of our study was the rate of adequate bowel preparation, as defined by all 3 segments 2 or 3 on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Secondary outcomes included the Bubble Scale (BS) score and ADR. Adverse effects related to bowel preparation were systematically administered by a trained nurse using standardized patient questionnaire.
resultsA total of 668 participants were randomly assigned to either the 200 mg group (n = 332) or 1200 mg SIM group (n = 336). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Additionally, no significant differences were observed in adequate bowel preparation rate (95.8% vs. 97.6%, P = 0.276) and ADR (22.3% vs. 25.6%, P = 0.561). Both regimens were well tolerated and accepted by participants, as assessed through a standardized patient questionnaire.
conclusion200 mg versus 1200 mg of SIM in 3 L PEG-ELS for afternoon colonoscopy demonstrated no statistically significant difference in bowel cleansing quality, ADR and bowel preparation-related adverse events. This evidence supports the clinical feasibility of 200 mg simethicone as an effective alternative for optimizing colonic preparation while maintaining procedural standards.
trial registrationThis clinical trial was retrospectively registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration No. ChiCTR2400089196) on 3 September 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.