Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41073838›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2025

Out-of-pocket vaccination of 0-6 aged children: choice or face of women's status.

Sevinç Sütlü, Binali Çatak

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sevinç SütlüFaculty of Health Sciences, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Turkey. ssutlu@mehmetakif.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6847-1798
Binali ÇatakFaculty of Medicine, Düzce University, Düzce, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization recognizes vaccines as the most effective method for preventing infectious diseases in terms of cost-effectiveness and safety.

aimsThe aim of this study was to determine whether the factors determining the social status of the mother affect children's access to paid vaccines that are not included in the national vaccination program.

methodsThe population of the cross-sectional study consisted of children between the ages of 6 months and 6 years who were examined in state hospitals. The sample size was calculated as 383. Face-to-face interview technique was used in data collection between May and September 2023. Chi-square tests were used in pairwise analyses, and logistic regression analysis was used to investigate causal relationships.

resultsThe mother's education level was above 8 years (OR 0.299; CI .129-.695), having a job where she could retire (OR 1.700; CI 1.025-2.821), residing in the city center (OR 1.835; CI 1.117-3.015), age above 24 years (OR 0.227; CI .078-.664), and full compliance with the routine vaccination schedule (OR 3.700; CI 1.245-11.000) increase non-routine vaccination of children.

conclusionFactors affecting the social status of mothers also affect children's access to out-of-pocket vaccines. Every investment made to raise the status of women will positively affect the health of children. The most common reasons given for not vaccinating were a lack of knowledge about the vaccine and not being recommended by the doctor. Healthcare professionals should update their knowledge and inform their patients about vaccines outside the national vaccination program.

Indexed as

MothersVaccinationAdultChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMaleSocial ClassYoung AdultChildrenStatus of womenVaccinationVaccine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.