ArticleJournal of religion and health2026
Development and Validation of the AI-Driven Pedagogical Leadership Agility Scale (AIDPLA): Exploring Ethical and Spiritual Dimensions of Educational Leadership in Jordan.
Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was twofold: first, to design a novel scale for measuring AI-driven pedagogical leadership agility, with a particular focus on its ethical and spiritual dimensions within educational leadership, and second, to evaluate the psychometric properties of this scale among secondary school administrators in Jordan. The primary aim was to provide a reliable and valid instrument to support leaders in navigating AI integration while maintaining ethical accountability and fostering spiritually informed leadership practices. The study proceeded in two main phases. Initially, the conceptual framework and item pool were developed based on a systematic literature review and semi-structured interviews with educational experts. Subsequently, data were collected from a stratified random sample of 740 secondary school principals in Jordan, and construct validity was examined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), exploratory graph analysis (EGA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability was assessed through Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, composite reliability, and test-retest stability, while convergent validity, discriminant validity, and measurement invariance across gender were also evaluated. The analyses revealed a robust five-factor structure underpinning the scale, consisting of 33 items distributed across Algorithmic Vision in Educational Leadership, Spiritual Visionary Leadership, Ethics and Algorithmic Transparency in AI-Enabled School Leadership, AI-Enabled Innovative Educational Leadership, and AI-Responsive Crisis Management Leadership. CFA confirmed excellent model fit, and reliability indices demonstrated strong internal consistency and stability. Among the dimensions, Spiritual Visionary Leadership and Ethics and Algorithmic Transparency showed the highest reliability and predictive importance. Overall, findings suggest that the AI-Driven Pedagogical Leadership Agility Scale (AIDPLA) is a valid and reliable tool for assessing leadership agility infused with ethical and spiritual considerations in the context of AI integration in Jordanian secondary education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41073808What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.