Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41073794›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2026

Digital twins for personalized treatment in uro-oncology in the era of artificial intelligence.

Magdalena Görtz, Carlos Brandl, Anna Nitschke, Anja Riediger, Daniel Stromer, Michael Byczkowski, Vincent Heuveline, Matthias Weidemüller

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. [Digital twins in uro-oncology].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Magdalena GörtzJunior Clinical Cooperation Unit 'Multiparametric Methods for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer', German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. magdalena.goertz@dkfz-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-6195-1609
Carlos BrandlQuantum Dynamics of Atomic and Molecular Systems,R Institute of Physics, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Anna NitschkeQuantum Dynamics of Atomic and Molecular Systems,R Institute of Physics, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-5891-4298
Anja RiedigerJunior Clinical Cooperation Unit 'Multiparametric Methods for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer', German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7567-8153
Daniel StromerPattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Michael ByczkowskiSAP SE, Walldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7004-1586
Vincent HeuvelineEngineering Mathematics and Computing Lab (EMCL), Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing (IWR), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias WeidemüllerQuantum Dynamics of Atomic and Molecular Systems,R Institute of Physics, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5639-5126

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

'Digital twins', also called 'digital patient twins' or 'virtual human twins' - digital patient-specific models derived from multimodal health data - are a strong focus in health care and are emerging as a promising tool for improving personalized care in uro-oncology. These models can integrate clinical, genomic, imaging and histopathological information to simulate organ behaviour and disease progress as well as predict responses to treatments. The concept of digital twins has shown potential in various fields, but its application in uro-oncology is still evolving, with few assessments of their feasibility and clinical utility. The advent of artificial intelligence adds a new dimension to their development, potentially enabling the synthesis of diverse, high-quality datasets to improve modelling accuracy and support real-time decision-making. However, substantial challenges exist, including data integration, patient privacy, computational demands and ethical frameworks. In addition, the interpretability of predictions remains essential for gaining clinical trust and guiding patient-centred decisions. The use of digital twins in uro-oncology has the potential to improve patient stratification and treatment planning; however, barriers must be overcome for their successful implementation in clinical routine. By integrating new technologies, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and prioritizing transparency, digital twins could shape the future of precision uro-oncology.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMedical OncologyPatient-Specific ModelingPrecision MedicineUrologic NeoplasmsUrologyHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.