Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41073788›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2025

Nucleotide dependency analysis of genomic language models detects functional elements.

Pedro Tomaz da Silva, Alexander Karollus, Johannes Hingerl, Gihanna Sta Teresa Galindez, Nils Wagner, Xavier Hernandez-Alias, Danny Incarnato, Julien Gagneur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. In silico prediction of variant effects: promises and limitations for precision plant breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  14. Orthrus: Towards Evolutionary and Functional RNA Foundation Models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Recipes and ingredients for deep learning models of 3D genome folding.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pedro Tomaz da Silva *School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6320-4885
Alexander Karollus *School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Johannes HingerlSchool of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8260-032X
Gihanna Sta Teresa GalindezSchool of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Nils WagnerSchool of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5661-1646
Xavier Hernandez-AliasSchool of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8633-499X
Danny IncarnatoDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute (GBB), University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3944-2327
Julien GagneurSchool of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. gagneur@in.tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8924-8365

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) TRR267 (403584255)European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) Postdoctoral Fellowship (ALTF 792-2022)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deciphering how nucleotides in genomes encode regulatory instructions and molecular machines is a long-standing goal. Genomic language models (gLMs) implicitly capture functional elements and their organization from genomic sequences alone by modeling probabilities of each nucleotide given its sequence context. However, discovering functional genomic elements from gLMs has been challenging due to the lack of interpretable methods. Here we introduce nucleotide dependencies, which quantify how nucleotide substitutions at one genomic position affect the probabilities of nucleotides at other positions. We demonstrate that nucleotide dependencies are more effective at indicating the deleteriousness of genetic variants than alignment-based conservation and gLM reconstruction. Dependency analysis accurately detects regulatory motifs and highlights bases in contact within RNAs, including pseudoknots and tertiary structure contacts, revealing new, experimentally validated RNA structures. Finally, we leverage dependency maps to reveal critical limitations of several gLM architectures and training strategies. Altogether, nucleotide dependency analysis opens a new avenue for discovering and studying functional elements and their interactions in genomes.

Indexed as

GenomeGenomicsModels, GeneticNucleotidesHumansNucleic Acid ConformationRNANucleotidesRNA

Identifiers

PMID41073788
PMCPMC12513839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.