ArticleInternational journal of behavioral medicine2025
Personal Listening Devices and Hearing Health: The Psychological and Social Factors Influencing Undergraduate Students' Safe Listening Behaviors.
Article in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tertiary music students' hearing health behaviors: ignorance is not bliss.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecreational noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is a growing public health concern, particularly among young adults who frequently use personal listening devices (PLDs) at high volumes. While previous research has examined the prevalence of unsafe listening and low NIHL awareness, less attention has been paid to the behavioral and psychological mechanisms that sustain risky listening habits.
objectiveThis study explored the psychological, cognitive, and social factors influencing unsafe PLD use among undergraduate students, with a particular focus on optimism bias, cognitive dissonance, peer norms, environmental constraints, and limited awareness of protective strategies.
methodsA secondary thematic analysis was conducted using open-ended responses from a cross-sectional survey of 154 undergraduate students at a large urban university in South Africa. Unlike previous analyses that emphasized descriptive statistics, this study applied a behavioral science lens to examine the psychosocial determinants underlying persistent high-volume listening.
resultsFive interrelated themes emerged: (1) Optimism bias and perceived invincibility-students underestimated their risk of NIHL or viewed it as a distant concern; (2) Social reinforcement-peer norms normalized high-volume listening; (3) Cognitive dissonance-students rationalized their behaviors to reduce internal conflict; (4) Environmental barriers-noisy academic and transport settings encouraged volume increases; and (5) Limited awareness of safer listening alternatives-many students lacked knowledge of device-based protections such as volume limiters. These findings suggest that knowledge alone is insufficient in changing listening behaviors, as students' decisions are shaped by psychological rationalizations, peer influence, and situational constraints.
conclusionsNIHL prevention strategies should extend beyond conventional awareness campaigns to include behaviorally informed interventions. Universities and public health stakeholders should implement practical technology-based nudges, peer-driven social norm-shifting campaigns, and personalized risk-feedback tools to reduce NIHL risk among young adults across global settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41073642What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.