ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025
[Misinformation and disinformation about dietary supplements in social media: limiting the risks, seizing the opportunities, and shaping structures].
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Nutrition recommendations for people with diabetes (Update 2026)].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social media is an important and popular source of information related to dietary supplements (DSs); at the same time, social media also spreads potentially harmful misinformation and disinformation. Content on DSs is usually economically motivated without this being transparently recognizable to users. This situation is highly problematic in terms of consumer health protection. Nevertheless, social media offers excellent opportunities for evidence-based education of the population about DS-related benefits and risks.While the effects of social media information on users' health behavior, health, and nutrition have been well studied, there is a lack of specific data on DSs. This article therefore summarizes the data available on DS-related information on social media and identifies specific risks and opportunities from the perspective of consumer health protection. On this basis, concrete recommendations for action are derived that should serve to shape DS-specific structures in the context of social media that benefit both consumers and reputable DS manufacturers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.