Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41073609›Full record

ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025

[Misinformation and disinformation about dietary supplements in social media: limiting the risks, seizing the opportunities, and shaping structures].

Emma C Gauch, Martin Smollich

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emma C GauchInstitut für Ernährungsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Deutschland.
Martin SmollichInstitut für Ernährungsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Deutschland. martin.smollich@uksh.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media is an important and popular source of information related to dietary supplements (DSs); at the same time, social media also spreads potentially harmful misinformation and disinformation. Content on DSs is usually economically motivated without this being transparently recognizable to users. This situation is highly problematic in terms of consumer health protection. Nevertheless, social media offers excellent opportunities for evidence-based education of the population about DS-related benefits and risks.While the effects of social media information on users' health behavior, health, and nutrition have been well studied, there is a lack of specific data on DSs. This article therefore summarizes the data available on DS-related information on social media and identifies specific risks and opportunities from the perspective of consumer health protection. On this basis, concrete recommendations for action are derived that should serve to shape DS-specific structures in the context of social media that benefit both consumers and reputable DS manufacturers.

Indexed as

Consumer Health InformationDietary SupplementsInformation DisseminationSocial MediaGermanyHumansRisk AssessmentConsumer health protectionFake newsInfluencersNutrition informationScience communication

Identifiers

PMID41073609
PMCPMC12583329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.