ReviewPlant cell reports2025
Biparental plastid inheritance and its implications in plastid genome engineering.
Review in Plant cell reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
key messageThis review discusses the mechanism of the inherirance of plastids (and other organelles), where maternal inhertiance is predominat. This inheritance can be shifted to be biparental by modulating genetic and environmental factors, which can have implications in plant fitness and plastid genome engneering to attain homoplastomic plants in fewer generations. In most plant species, plastids (and mitochondria) are inherited maternally, a mode of transmission that ensures cytoplasmic and genetic compatibility, thereby supporting plant fitness. However, in certain species, plastids (and mitochondria) can be inherited from both parents, a phenomenon known as biparental plastid inheritance (BPI), which occurs in approximately 20% of angiosperms. In maternal inheritance, these organelles are excluded during male gametogenesis, probably through genetically regulated selective degradation of the organelle genome and other cytoplasmic components from the generative cell (GC) of pollen grains. Environmental factors like temperature also influence this process. While maternal plastid inheritance has been studied extensively, the mechanisms and significance of BPI remain comparatively underexplored. Recent studies showed that modulation of either of the genes involved or temperature conditions during pollen development results in the inheritance of cytoplasm, including plastids from pollen cells, promoting biparental inheritance of plastids (and likely of mitochondria) in plants. Our review discusses the role and evolutionary relevance of BPI, addressing why it is an uncommon yet vital mechanism in plants. An emphasis is given on the mechanisms of maternal inheritance, and on how modulation of genetic and environmental factors can achieve BPI. Furthermore, we underscore the significance of BPI, particularly in producing homoplasmic transplastomic plants with broad applications in agriculture and synthetic biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41073605What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.