ArticleScientific reports2025
Performance optimization and fouling study of geopolymer-zeolite composite membranes for sustainable textile wastewater treatment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in Physicochemical and Biological Treatment of Textile Wastewater: An Applied Review of Methods, Technologies, and Costs.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research introduced a cost-efficient and eco-friendly sustainable geopolymer-zeolite composite membrane produced using a non-hydrothermal technique optimized for treating textile wastewater. A new geopolymer-zeolite composite membrane for microfiltration (macroporosity) was generated by activating metakaolin with sodium hydroxide and silica fume. The design of the experiment methodology (full factorial and response surface methodology) was used to identify the most effective parameters and optimize membrane separation performance. The optimum membrane showed the maximum normalized permeability and turbidity reduction of 0.57 and 97.98%, respectively, at 1.2 bar pressure, 59.6
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.