ArticleScientific reports2025
Assessment of physiological stress on plants grown in soil contaminated with microplastics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Navigating microplastic-induced stress in plants: adaptations from physiology to gene regulation.Plant molecular biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current study was conducted with the aim to analyze the effect of microplastics on vegetable plants i.e., Spring Onion and Okra. Three types of microplastics sources were used i.e., Transparent plastic Bottles (Polyethylene terephthalate) (PET); transparent plastic bags (High-density polyethylene) (HDPE) and Polyester fiber (100% Polyester) (PES). Each type of plastic was mechanically/manually shredded to an approximate size of 4 mm and subsequently incorporated into soil at a concentration of 1% w/w. Control groups without microplastic addition were also established for comparison. Germinated seeds of spring onion and okra were sown in each experimental setup and plants were monitored and analyzed for morphological characteristics, oxidative stress indicators, and pigment content, including chlorophyll and carotenoids. The findings revealed that microplastic exposure had a statistically significant effect on plant health and development. Among the three microplastic types, PET induced the least detrimental effects, while HDPE and PES exhibited more pronounced impacts. All microplastic treatments led to a decrease in chlorophyll and carotenoid levels, alongside an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and lipid peroxidation, indicative of heightened oxidative stress. Additionally, reductions in key morphological parameters such as plant height, leaf number, and biomass were observed. Results of the study underscores the potential ecological risks posed by microplastic contamination in soil, highlighting its capacity to adversely affect plant physiology and development. Therefore, emphasizes the urgent need for strategies to mitigate microplastic pollution in terrestrial ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.