ArticleScientific reports2025
Temporal changes in cognitive functions and associated factors among stimulant users: a 12-month, prospective study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive impairments are commonly observed in individuals who use stimulants, yet few studies have tracked these individuals longitudinally. This prospective, 12-month longitudinal study investigated changes in cognitive functioning among active stimulant users and explored the associated factors. Adults with recent stimulant use were recruited from substance misuse treatment clinics and the community. Their demographics, history of drug use, and stimulant use disorder severity were assessed with structured clinical interviews. Global cognitive function and frontal executive function were measured every three months using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) over one year. Linear mixed-effects models evaluated temporal trajectories and associated factors related to the Changes in cognitive functions. Among 76 analysed participants, their frequency of stimulant uses were active and stable over 12 months. The MoCA scores averaged below the clinical cut-off at baseline, although no further persistent decline was observed. In contrast, FAB scores presented no systematic temporal changes. Being female and being of older ages were found to be associated with lower MoCA and FAB. None of severity, education, recent stimulant use, and lifetime duration of use, were found to be associated with cognition. While stimulant users exhibited some modest cognitive declines at baseline, no further substantial cognitive deterioration was observed over the one-year study period. Cognitive outcomes were more strongly associated with demographic factors than SUD severity or stimulant use patterns. These findings highlight the need for more sensitive tools to detect subtle cognitive changes associated with stimulant uses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.