ArticleScientific reports2025
Conventional and hybrid time series models for forecasting medication dispensing and errors integration in automated dispensing cabinets.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs) represent a critical innovation in modern healthcare, revolutionizing medication management by improving efficiency, accuracy, and security. With the increasing reliance on these technologies, optimizing their performance is paramount. This study aims to apply conventional, hybrid time series, and machine learning models to forecast three key performance indicators of ADCs: items dispensation, override occurrences, and error integration. Using monthly data from the MICU at Almoosa Hospital between January 2023 and December 2024, we employed both traditional linear time series models (e.g., autoregressive models, simple exponential smoothing, autoregressive moving average, and theta models) and advanced non-linear machine learning models (e.g., NPAR, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN)) in various hybrid configurations (ARIMA-ANN, EMS-ANN, NPAR-ANN). Model accuracy was assessed using key metrics such as RMSE, MAE, MAPE, and RMSLE, with a bootstrap 95% CI to ensure the best performance for predicting future trends. The study demonstrated that the NPAR-ANN, a hybrid model combining nonparametric ARIMA and artificial neural networks, showed superior performance. The model demonstrated the best performance, achieving the lowest RMSE values. Specifically, for the number of items issued, it attained an RMSE of 71.50, for overrides an RMSE of 15.43, while for error integration, and an RMSE of 20.92 lowest among all competing models. This novel study modeled key parameters of ADCs, providing data-driven insights that can inform hospital decision-making and optimize medication management. The study showcased the application of hybrid machine learning models in forecasting critical ADC parameters, offering valuable data-driven insights for hospital administrators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.