ArticleScientific reports2025
Unraveling the roles of network and tunnels in the conductivity of carbon nanofiber composites.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Study of Structural and Multifunctional Characteristics in Dynamic Transesterification-Aided Epoxy Carbon Nanocomposites.Polymers · 2026Article
- Ion-exchange functionalized polystyrene-based composites: synthesis, conductive hybridization, and environmental applications.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Estimation of electrical conductivity for polymer composites with carbon black nanoparticles by interphase depth, tunneling characteristics and network percentage.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Degree of conduction transfer through incomplete interphases controlling the conductivity of carbon nanofiber composites.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Predictive modeling of conductivity for carbon black nanocomposites: influence of filler features, interfacial effects and network portion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Herein, an advanced conductivity model for polymer-carbon nanofiber (CNF) samples is introduced, stated as PCNFs. This model considers the length (l), radius (R) and amount of CNFs, interphase depth, percolation onset (PT), waviness, network portion, and tunneling length (d), by reasonable and meaningful equations. The proposed model is verified through the measured conductivity of samples and by studying the features' influences on the PCNF conductivity. The model calculations display respectable fitting with the experimented facts from numerous CNF samples. Additionally, all factors sensibly affect the conductivity of PCNFs. Longer and thinner CNFs, higher CNF amount, thicker interphase, shorter tunnels, and lower percolation onset lead to higher conductivity in PCNF. R > 50 nm and l < 15 μm produce an insulative composite, but the top conductivity of 0.21 S/m is displayed at R = 10 nm and l = 25 μm. Accordingly, narrower and bigger nanofibers can improve the conductivity. Furthermore, an insulative material is produced by PT = 0.04 nm and d > 5 nm, nevertheless the conductivity maximizes to 0.25 S/m at the least values of PT = 0.01 nm and d = 2 nm. These results disclose that the lowest percolation onset and narrowest tunnels yield the highest conductivity in the composite.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.