Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41073561›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Unraveling the roles of network and tunnels in the conductivity of carbon nanofiber composites.

Yasser Zare, Muhammad Naqvi, Kyong Yop Rhee, Soo-Jin Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yasser ZareBiomaterials and Tissue Engineering Research Group, Department of Interdisciplinary Technologies, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran. y.zare@aut.ac.ir.
Muhammad NaqviCollege of Engineering and Technology, American University of the Middle East, Egaila, 54200, Kuwait.
Kyong Yop RheeDepartment of Mechanical Engineering (BK21 four), College of Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, Republic of Korea. rheeky@khu.ac.kr.
Soo-Jin ParkDepartment of Mechanical Engineering (BK21 four), College of Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, Republic of Korea. sjpark@inha.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herein, an advanced conductivity model for polymer-carbon nanofiber (CNF) samples is introduced, stated as PCNFs. This model considers the length (l), radius (R) and amount of CNFs, interphase depth, percolation onset (PT), waviness, network portion, and tunneling length (d), by reasonable and meaningful equations. The proposed model is verified through the measured conductivity of samples and by studying the features' influences on the PCNF conductivity. The model calculations display respectable fitting with the experimented facts from numerous CNF samples. Additionally, all factors sensibly affect the conductivity of PCNFs. Longer and thinner CNFs, higher CNF amount, thicker interphase, shorter tunnels, and lower percolation onset lead to higher conductivity in PCNF. R > 50 nm and l < 15 μm produce an insulative composite, but the top conductivity of 0.21 S/m is displayed at R = 10 nm and l = 25 μm. Accordingly, narrower and bigger nanofibers can improve the conductivity. Furthermore, an insulative material is produced by PT = 0.04 nm and d > 5 nm, nevertheless the conductivity maximizes to 0.25 S/m at the least values of PT = 0.01 nm and d = 2 nm. These results disclose that the lowest percolation onset and narrowest tunnels yield the highest conductivity in the composite.

Indexed as

Carbon nanofiber (CNF)Electrical conductivityNetworkPolymer nanocompositeTunneling region

Identifiers

PMID41073561
PMCPMC12514190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.